The court matters council has been party to, assembled from its agendas, minutes and published judgments.
6 Margit Crescent Sunrise Beach dual occupancy
Settled
- What it was about
- MCU22/0060 — dual occupancy; decision under appeal not established (refusal or conditions)
- Property or topic
- 6 Margit Crescent Sunrise Beach (Lot 116 RP 132135)
- Parties
- Sunshine Enterprises Pty Ltd (Qld) v Noosa Shire Council [applicant per DA register]
- Consultant
- Property Projects Australia Pty Ltd
- How it ended
- Council approved the defence (OM 15 Dec 2022); ratified settlement on conditions in confidential Attachment 1 (OM 20 Apr 2023), 2023-04-20
- Development application
- MCU22/0060
What the record shows
Same street and consultant as 11 Margit Cres (N/A-BD1074-2021). eTrack "Appeal Settled Judgment Issued" (eTrack checked 19 Sep 2026). Wrongly entered on 19 Sep 2026 as settled under delegation; corrected the same day
Before council
Every time council named this appeal on a published agenda. Council does not publish a list of the appeals it runs; it has to name each one on an agenda whenever it decides something about it, usually to take the item into closed session.
| Meeting | Session |
|---|---|
| 11 April 2023 Planning & Environment Committee Meeting - April 2023 | open · ▶ recording |
From this site's legal register, compiled from Queensland Judgments, the Information Commissioner and council's own agendas and minutes; the source for this matter is linked here. All court matters →
Elsewhere on this site
Every page here that links to this one, by section.