The court matters council has been party to, assembled from its agendas, minutes and published judgments.

Skyfall Noosa Pty Ltd (Heidi Meyer & Kim Carroll) v Noosa Shire Council

Planning & Environment Court · 2026-

Live

What it was about

Applicant-commenced proceeding over council action notices on two dwelling-house DAs (proposed Lots 50 & 51): council says impact-assessable dual occupancy, applicants say code-assessable dwelling houses

Property or topic

39-41 Picture Point Crescent Noosa Heads (proposed Lots 50 & 51)

Parties

Skyfall Noosa Pty Ltd (Heidi Meyer & Kim Carroll) v Noosa Shire Council

Consultant

Brennan Planning Pty Ltd

How it ended

Press report (Sunshine Coast News, Candice Holznagel, 14 Jul 2026), 2026-06-11

Development applications

MCU25/0106, MCU25/0107, MCU25/0108

What the record shows

DAs lodged 19 Sep 2025; council action notices 3 Oct 2025; applicants missed the 23 Apr 2026 response deadline and began P&E Court proceedings 5 May 2026. On 11 Jun 2026 the court allowed the missed deadline to be corrected and gave the parties until 18 Jun 2026 to agree a further response period. eTrack (eTrack checked 19 Sep 2026): MCU25/0106 "Stop Current Period", MCU25/0107 and MCU25/0108 "Application returned". No closed-session item found in the 2025-2026 corpus. Follows settled subdivision appeal D130/2023 on the same lot (N/A-D130-2023). Each proposed dwelling up to 4 storeys / 12 m; lots 722.8 and 722.9 sqm. Meyer and Carroll formerly owned Malumba Estate, Buderim (sold 2021); their approved Badderam eco-resort was scrapped in 2022

From this site's legal register, compiled from Queensland Judgments, the Information Commissioner and council's own agendas and minutes; the source for this matter is linked here. All court matters →