Deputations and public questions to council, each opening on what council's minutes record of it.
2026-01-22
Public question
Ordinary Meeting
Pat Spicer
Heard at the meeting. Council's recording has these questions from 33:43; our transcript is below.
▶ Hear it — council's recording, from 33:43
The feed timestamps the whole public question block rather than each speaker, so this starts at the top of that block.
What the minutes record
Question 1
While there were restrictions on releasing information to the public regarding the loss or $2.4 million through fraud in December 2024, were all staff in the financial department fully briefed on the contents of the Queensland Audit Office report immediately after the report was received as it explicitly warned about the fraud risk in "super master file" data changes and provided a case study of a recent council loss through such data changes being made to supplier bank account details?
Response from Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt
Firstly, I’d like to confirm that whilst the initial loss was $2.3M, through recovery by the bank and our insurers, the current figure is $1.7M. This is still a substantial amount and Council does not take this lightly. We are making a range of changes and additions to prevent this happening again.
Council was notified by QAO in March 2024 of the fraud event that targeted Gold Coast Council prior to the calculated attack on Noosa Council.
Also as documented in our previous reports to the Audit and Risk committee and Council, the recommendations from the 2025 QAO Noosa Shire Council Interim Audit Report have been implemented or substantially progressed. Specifically;
Council has met all reporting obligations Council has conducted regular mandatory cyber-fraud training to better equip our staff for such activities Council has strengthened processes for updating, maintaining and securing the vendor credit Masterfile including the development of a Vendor Maintenance Policy Council is in the process of establishing an independent, risk-based financial accountability program to review and audit the accuracy and proper use of financial information Council has substantially progressed the implementation of third-party payment protection software (EFTsure) to validate banking information
Question 2
Why is Noosa Council taking on the state responsibility of providing housing by spending millions above grants to remediate and install all infrastructure for housing at 64 Lake Macdonald Drive Cooroy as well as entering into a contract with Coast2Bay to build 26 units when it is a fact that this site does not meet the housing strategy actions of ready access to services, transport and proximity to work?
Response from Director Strategic Planning & Environment Kim Rawlings
The housing crisis currently gripping Australia is one that neither the State or Federal governments are going to be able to solve alone in a short time. Rather than sitting back and expecting the problem to be solved by other levels of government, Noosa Council along with many other Local Governments has chosen to be part of the solution. Despite the belief by some that this is not a Local Government responsibility, Local governments have a responsibility to ensure their communities are places people want to live and families can thrive, with amenities and services critical to people’s livelihoods. Local Governments are specifically required to plan for the needs of its community under the Local Government Act, this could legitimately include land use and development outcomes to support housing. Many Councils across Australia are increasingly exploring how they can support affordable housing in response to local needs including Sunshine Coast and Moreton Bay amongst others. Councils also have a critical role in enabling housing outcomes through planning, servicing and often land.
Noosa Council's 2018 Social Justice Charter commits Council to implementing policies and providing services that decrease inequality, to doing what it can to ensure Noosa is a diverse community where there are affordable places for people to live. At the 2021 Census there were 2,461 low to medium income Noosa Shire households in housing stress. Since then, the situation has only worsened. To illustrate, the median weekly rent for Cooroy has increased from $500 at the time of the 2021 census to $800 in the September 2025 quarter. That's a 60% increase in 4 years.
In endorsing the 2022 Housing Strategy Noosa Council committed to encouraging greater public and private investment in more social and affordable housing in the Shire and partnering with registered Community Housing Providers and others with the aim of providing more social and affordable. This included investigating Council owned land which might be put to the purpose of housing locals. The land at Lake Macdonald Drive was just one site subject to feasibility investigations with others being in the centres at Noosa Junction and at Tewantin. Thes actions are specifically listed in the Housing Strategy and therefore do meet the Housing strategy actions. A Guide for Local Councils in Delivery of Affordable Housing, produced by the ALGA, Housing Australia and Australian Community Housing has recently showcased Noosa Council's efforts, including the Cooroy land-based contribution to social housing delivery
This is council's own minuted record, in council's words. Nothing is reworded: the questions, headings and bullets are laid out as the printed minutes set them. Left out are the speaker's name (it heads this page), the minutes' page-header dates, and any “meeting adjourned” line the extract caught. Where an officer answered, the answer is minuted with the question and appears above.
Transcript of the recording
What this is. Transcript of council's recording, produced by automatic speech recognition and not checked line by line against the video. Names and figures are where this kind of transcript fails first. It is our transcript, not council's record. Recording © Noosa Shire Council. Council's own recording is linked above; where the two differ, the recording governs.
33:43 Mayor Wilkie: adequate funding. Thank you. Thank you Mr O'Connor. The last application for two questions is again from Mrs Pat Spicer. Mrs Spicer your two questions will be answered by Acting Director Margaret Gatt on behalf of the Director of
33:57 Pat Spicer: Strategy Environment Kim Rawls. Through the Chair. Background information. The Queensland Fraud Office Local Government 2024 Report, Report 13-2024-25 available on the website. The press released in October 2025 stating council had been directed not to release information about the fraud so as not to jeopardise ongoing investigations. The report at the December Ordinary Meeting outlined the rather comprehensive measures that have been put in place in retrospect but were staff aware of this possible fraud target area prior to the event? So my question is while there were restrictions on releasing information to the public regarding the loss of 2.4 million through fraud in December 2024, were all the staff in the financial department fully briefed on the contents of the Queensland Audit Office report immediately after the report was received? As it explicitly warned about the fraud risk in super master file data changes and provided a case study of a recent council loss through such data changes being made to supply a bank account details.
35:27 Thank you. Director Gatt.
Also by Pat Spicer
Others who spoke that day