Noosa Council Watch

An independent, unofficial record of Noosa Shire Council — what council decided, what they closed the doors on, and why it matters. About this site

Noosa Council meetings since 2014: papers, decisions and recordings, and from April 2023 the video cued to each item.

General Committee Meeting - 14 March 2022

Monday 14 March 2022 · General Committee Meeting · 12 decisions minuted

This meeting predates council's current meetings system, which begins in April 2023, so there is no agenda here with each item cued to the video. What follows is what the record holds: council's papers, the recording, and the decisions its minutes record.

Papers

Council keeps papers from before April 2023 on a separate archive page for each year, listed by meeting date. The files stay on council's site — why.

Recording

Decisions

Every decision the minutes record, in the order minuted. Where a division was called the names are on the contested votes register; otherwise the minutes say only whether it carried.

  1. Confirmation of Minutes
  2. The Minutes of the General Committee Meeting held on 14 February 2022 be received and confirmed. committee resolution Carried unanimously

    The Minutes of the General Committee Meeting held on 14 February 2022 be received and confirmed.

    Moved by Amelia Lorentson, seconded by Clare Stewart.

    Carried unanimously. The minutes do not name who voted which way.

    link to this decision

  3. MCU19/0089.02 & OPW19/0160.02 – Minor Change to Development Approval for Retail Business Type 5 Vehicle Uses, Retail Business Type 2 Shop and Operational Works – Signage at 52 – 54 Mary
  4. That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 regarding MCU19/0089.02 and OPW19/01… motion Development Superseded

    That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 regarding MCU19/0089.02 and OPW19/0160.02 to make a minor change to an existing approval for Material Change of Use - Retail Business - Type 2 Shop & Salon, Retail Business - Type 5 Vehicle Uses and Operational Works – Signage situated at 52-54 Mary St Noosaville and: A. Refuse the change for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change does not constitute a minor change to the development approval as the change in hours will increase the severity of known amenity impacts and likely attract further submissions objecting to the change were the application to be publicly notified given the site’s proximity to residential properties. 2. The proposed trading hours do not comply with Overall Outcomes 2 (d) & (h) and Performance Outcome PO11 & PO24 of the Business Activities Code as the proposed hours will adversely impact on nearby resident’s amenity. 3. The proposed trading hours do not comply with Overall Outcome 2(m) and Performance Outcome PO42 of the District Centre Zone Code as the proposed change in hours will impact the amenity of nearby residential premises as nearby residents would not reasonably expect the service to be operational at this time. 4. The proposed illuminated signage does not comply with Specific Outcome AO7 and Overall Outcome O7 of the Advertising Devices Code within the Noosa Plan 2006 as it proposes more than one illuminated sign and is not compatible with the visual amenity of the surrounding area. 5. The proposed additional illuminated signage is not consistent with provisions of the Local Law signage requirements as the proposal exceeds the maximum number of signs permitted to be illuminated and is prohibited by the Local Law. B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016. C. Request the CEO to convene a Councillor workshop for Councillors, to allow the review and further discussion regarding the signage laws and associated policies. D Request the CEO to, if necessary, provide a report to a future Council meeting outlining any changes, updates or improvements to the laws and policies, as may be proposed at the Councillor workshop.

    Moved by Clare Stewart, seconded by Karen Finzel.

    The minutes record no vote on this motion: they go straight on to the amendment that followed, below.

    link to this decision

  5. That Item D be amended to read: D. Request the CEO to, if necessary, provide a report to a future Council meeting outlining any changes, updates or improvements… amendment Development Carried unanimously

    That Item D be amended to read: D. Request the CEO to, if necessary, provide a report to a future Council meeting outlining any changes, updates or improvements to the signage laws and policies, as may be proposed at the Councillor workshop.

    Moved by Frank Wilkie, seconded by Brian Stockwell.

    Carried unanimously. The minutes do not name who voted which way.

    link to this decision

  6. That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 regarding MCU19/0089.02 and OPW19/01… committee recommendation Development Carried unanimously

    That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 regarding MCU19/0089.02 and OPW19/0160.02 to make a minor change to an existing approval for Material Change of Use - Retail Business - Type 2 Shop & Salon, Retail Business - Type 5 Vehicle Uses and Operational Works – Signage situated at 52-54 Mary St Noosaville and: A. Refuse the change for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change does not constitute a minor change to the development approval as the change in hours will increase the severity of known amenity impacts and likely attract further submissions objecting to the change were the application to be publicly notified given the site’s proximity to residential properties. 2. The proposed trading hours do not comply with Overall Outcomes 2 (d) & (h) and Performance Outcome PO11 & PO24 of the Business Activities Code as the proposed hours will adversely impact on nearby resident’s amenity. 3. The proposed trading hours do not comply with Overall Outcome 2(m) and Performance Outcome PO42 of the District Centre Zone Code as the proposed change in hours will impact the amenity of nearby residential premises as nearby residents would not reasonably expect the service to be operational at this time. 4. The proposed illuminated signage does not comply with Specific Outcome AO7 and Overall Outcome O7 of the Advertising Devices Code within the Noosa Plan 2006 as it proposes more than one illuminated sign and is not compatible with the visual amenity of the surrounding area. 5. The proposed additional illuminated signage is not consistent with provisions of the Local Law signage requirements as the proposal exceeds the maximum number of signs permitted to be illuminated and is prohibited by the Local Law. B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016. C. Request the CEO to convene a Councillor workshop for Councillors, to allow the review and further discussion regarding the signage laws and associated policies. D. Request the CEO to, if necessary, provide a report to a future Council meeting outlining any changes, updates or improvements to the signage laws and policies, as may be proposed at the Councillor workshop.

    Moved by Clare Stewart, seconded by Karen Finzel.

    Carried unanimously. The minutes do not name who voted which way.

    link to this decision

  7. Noosa River Stakeholder Advisory Committee Update
  8. That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager (Acting) to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 providing an upda… motion Superseded

    That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager (Acting) to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 providing an update on activities of the Noosa River Stakeholder Advisory Committee, and note the planned focus for 2022, and A. Request a Further Report to Council at a future meeting with a recommended approach to vessel management on the Noosa River t…

    Only the opening of this motion is shown; the full text is in the minutes on council's 2022 archive.

    Moved by Brian Stockwell, seconded by Clare Stewart.

    The minutes record no vote on this motion: they go straight on to the amendment that followed, below.

    link to this decision

  9. That item B be added to read: B. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to discuss with Maritime Safety Queensland as joint Chair of the Noosa River Advisory … amendment Lost · 3–4

    That item B be added to read: B. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to discuss with Maritime Safety Queensland as joint Chair of the Noosa River Advisory Committee, providing an invitation to the Noosa Boating and Fishing Alliance to represent the interests of the Alliance on the Noosa River Stakeholder Advisory Group and furthermore if agreed by Maritime Safety Queensland that the appointment of the Alliance is made in accordance with the Terms of Reference.

    Moved by Amelia Lorentson, seconded by Joe Jurisevic.

    for 3 — Amelia Lorentson, Clare Stewart, Tom Wegener
    against 4 — Brian Stockwell, Frank Wilkie, Joe Jurisevic, Karen Finzel

    link to this decision · on the contested votes register

  10. That Report 2 be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting dated 17 March 2022. procedural motion Lost · 1–6

    That Report 2 be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting dated 17 March 2022.

    Moved by Tom Wegener, seconded by Amelia Lorentson.

    for 1 — Tom Wegener
    against 6 — Frank Wilkie, Brian Stockwell, Joe Jurisevic, Clare Stewart, Karen Finzel, Amelia Lorentson

    link to this decision · on the contested votes register

  11. That item B be added to read: B. That Council invite a representative from the Noosa Boating and Fishing Alliance along with other interested parties to parti… amendment Carried unanimously

    That item B be added to read: B. That Council invite a representative from the Noosa Boating and Fishing Alliance along with other interested parties to participate in the upcoming publicly advertised expression of interest process to fill 2 vacant spaces on the Noosa River Stakeholder Advisory Committee.

    Moved by Frank Wilkie, seconded by Karen Finzel.

    Carried unanimously. The minutes do not name who voted which way.

    link to this decision

  12. That the preamble of the motion be amended to read: “That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager (Acting) to the Planning & Environment C… amendment Carried unanimously

    That the preamble of the motion be amended to read: “That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager (Acting) to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 providing an update on activities of the Noosa River Stakeholder Advisory Committee, in response to the high priority of vessel management in the Noosa River and note the planned focus for 2022, and”

    Moved by Karen Finzel, seconded by Frank Wilkie.

    Carried unanimously. The minutes do not name who voted which way.

    link to this decision

  13. That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager (Acting) to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 providing an upda… committee recommendation Carried · 6–1

    That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager (Acting) to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 March 2022 providing an update on activities of the Noosa River Stakeholder Advisory Committee, in response to the high priority of vessel management in the Noosa River and note the planned focus for 2022, and A. Request a Further Report to Council at a future meeti…

    Only the opening of this motion is shown; the full text is in the minutes on council's 2022 archive.

    Moved by Brian Stockwell, seconded by Clare Stewart.

    for 6 — Amelia Lorentson, Joe Jurisevic, Clare Stewart, Brian Stockwell, Karen Finzel, Frank Wilkie
    against 1 — Tom Wegener

    link to this decision · on the contested votes register

  14. Noosa North Shore Ferry Review and Proposed Tender
  15. That Council note the report by the Property Advisor to the General Committee Meeting dated 14 March 2022 and agree to proceed to the tender process for a new f… committee recommendation Contracts Carried unanimously

    That Council note the report by the Property Advisor to the General Committee Meeting dated 14 March 2022 and agree to proceed to the tender process for a new ferry service to commence in July 2024, based on the fully outsourced operating model identified as Option 2 and the recommended tender approach outlined in the report.

    Moved by Frank Wilkie, seconded by Clare Stewart.

    Carried unanimously. The minutes do not name who voted which way.

    link to this decision

  16. Financial Performance Report – February 2022
  17. That Council note the report by the Financial Services Manager (Acting) to the General Committee Meeting dated 14 March 2022 outlining February 2022 year to dat… committee recommendation Budget & finance Carried unanimously

    That Council note the report by the Financial Services Manager (Acting) to the General Committee Meeting dated 14 March 2022 outlining February 2022 year to date financial performance against budget, including changes to the financial performance report with the inclusion of key financial sustainability indicators.

    Moved by Brian Stockwell, seconded by Joe Jurisevic.

    Carried unanimously. The minutes do not name who voted which way.

    link to this decision

Source

Elsewhere on this site

Every page here that links to this one, by section.