Noosa Council Watch

An independent, unofficial record of Noosa Shire Council — what council decided, what they closed the doors on, and why it matters. About this site

Deputations and public questions to council, each opening on what council's minutes record of it.

2026-08-20 Deputation Ordinary Meeting

Adrian Reed, Noosa Waters Residents Association

Noosa Waters Advisory Group

Heard at the meeting. Council's recording has this deputation from 6:38; our transcript is below.

▶ Hear it — council's recording, from 6:38

What the minutes record

Applicant Adrian Reed, Noosa Waters Residents Association

Topic Noosa Waters Advisory Group

Speakers Adrian Reed

That is all the minutes say. Council does not minute what a deputation says — not a summary, not a topic sentence. Across every deputation in council's published meeting feed, the minuted discussion field is empty. The agenda names the speaker and the subject, and the rest exists only in the recording, linked above.

Council's feed lists 1 document against this item — Deputation Application. A deputation applicant writes down what they intend to say, so that document exists. It is not reproduced in the published meeting packet, and we have not seen it.

Transcript of the recording

What this is. Transcript of council's recording, produced by automatic speech recognition and not checked line by line against the video. Names and figures are where this kind of transcript fails first. It is our transcript, not council's record. Recording © Noosa Shire Council. Council's own recording is linked above; where the two differ, the recording governs.

6:38 Deputy Mayor Stockwell: So the next deputation is from Adrian Reid, representing the Noosa Waters Residents Association. And the topic that Adrian wants to talk to us about is the Noosa Waters Advisory Group. Welcome. Thank you.

6:54 Adrian Reid: Good morning, Mayor, where you are, and councillors. Thank you for the opportunity to speak. I'm Adrian Reid. I'm the president of the Noosa Waters Residents Association. Just before I get too far into... After the Terms of Reference process that we've been going down, I just thought I'd touch on who we represent. Noosa Waters is home to more than 1,100 households. And whilst we're thought of often as a waterfront estate, over half of those, of 550 households, are not on the waterfront at all. We have 25 public parks, 17 of them on the waterway. We're open to everybody. We're open to the Noosa community with playgrounds and off-leash dog parks amongst the other, I guess, facilities that we provide within this area. The waterway itself covers 42 hectares and more than 11 kilometres of reventment walls. Over the past year, our association and council have been working constructively to replace a 25-year-old partnership arrangement with the proper Terms of Reference process.

8:09 For the standing Noosa Waters Advisory Group. It sets up regular meetings, transparent information, sharing, and a commitment from council to table its maintenance plans and financials. And we support it. We're very grateful for the work that's been done behind it by councils and equally our association. I'd like to cover off quickly what our waterway actually is. It's not simply a private canal for waterfalls. It's not just for waterfront owners. It's a reserve for local government. It's a common lake area. We council as trustee. It's a stormwater drainage system for 240, sorry, 284 hectares of catchment. Roughly 44% of that lies outside of our state. It serves the wider community. Council's responsibility for it flows from the original agreement, original approvals from 1983. It's not just for the waterfront owners. And from the land at trustee duty confirmed by the minister to this council, not merely from the levies that are raised from waterfront residents. Leads me to my second point, which is the financial accountability and transparency.

9:24 It's the reason for the reporting provisions in the new Terms of Reference. And that's why they matter so much. Throughout this year, the review that we've done, we look very closely at the levies. And that's why they matter so much.

9:41 We've identified a number of costs charged to residents through those levies that are in fact council responsibilities as asset owner and trustee of the lake area. Things like salinity pumps, replacement of those pumps, pipe work, relevant examples. The original approval in 1983 itself allocated the pumping and maintenance. And maintenance of the water quality to council to be met by general rates. And yet over the past two decades, waterfront owners have effectively paid twice, full in general rates. And then obviously with the levy on top of that. That's exactly the kind of clarity that we're looking for. And as we look ahead, we welcome a clear shared understanding of what the levies fund and what council carries. As a responsibility as owner and trustee and the advisory group. And council applaud the constructive process that has been embraced under the TOR. The third is water quality. We're pleased to hear some of the discussion in the previous meeting.

10:57 But the reassurance offered in that general meeting that council's meeting guidelines does not fully tell the story. And in our view, doesn't show the council meeting its obligations as trustee to maintain the lake area. The current or currently the lake area has been held to a more relaxed, moderately disturbed standard. Well below the ecological value that the Noosa River demands that it drains into. And below the high standards that the lake was originally approved. And council is obligated to maintain as trustee for this lake. On the view on a few things that are measured. The inflow test position adjacent to this to see now key meets only that relaxed bar 65% of the time. And it's declining. According to the 2025 NICA annual water quality monitoring report. I don't think that's something that that clearly articulates that we're meeting an appropriate standard. The measure that actually tracks algae, nutrients and chlorophyll is not tested at all in our canal.

12:13 The original 1983 approval required a far broader monitoring program and active management of the catchment. And we've drifted a long way away from that. The catchment also has changed enormously since those approvals. With far greater stormwater volume, pollutant loads than the original design ever assumed. Those 1983 assumptions still underpin how the water quality framework is set and managed. But inevitably they're out of date. So beyond restoring the proper monitoring process and addressing the upstream sources. We ask that the underlying assumptions themselves be reassessed.

12:55 So the framework reflects the catchment as it is today. Not what it was 40 years ago. We'll be working with Council through the terms of reference where water quality is now a standing item. And to see that these obligations as trustee for Lake Erie are met. Simple low cost improvements to water quality close the gap should be fast tracked like pumping on hardtide. That's exactly what the lake was designed to do. We welcome support to get things like that done. Finally because the waterway serves as a wider public role. As a stormwater attenuation basin. Sharing the bare costs. Which is a framework called the Community Service Obligation or CSO referred to in the financials. Based on the catchment performance is a matter that we consider still as unresolved as part of the TOR. We ask that that be progressed openly through this TOR process. We actively want to work with Council through this advisory group and under the TOR framework. And we look forward to collectively managing the asset that belongs to Noosa as a whole.

14:12 And we are thankful for the collaborative approach that Council and its staff have taken to work with our committee. Thank you.

14:24 Deputy Mayor Stockwell: Thank you.

Others who spoke that day

Elsewhere on this site

Every page here that links to this one, by section.